Who is considered armed and dangerous based on reputation?

An individual with a history of violence or criminal activity is considered armed and dangerous based on reputation because their past behavior and actions indicate a potential threat to public safety. Such individuals have demonstrated a propensity for violence or engagement in criminal behavior, which can lead law enforcement and the community to perceive them as likely to possess weapons and be willing to use them. This reputation plays a critical role in assessing risk during encounters or investigations, as it helps officers prepare appropriately for potential dangers associated with the individual in question.

In contrast, individuals who are known for nonviolent behavior, community service, or those without a previous criminal record do not carry the same implications in terms of being armed and dangerous, as there is no historical precedent to suggest they would engage in violent acts.