What is a potential consequence of not photographing prints before lifting them?

The primary consequence of not photographing prints before lifting them is the potential loss of evidence leading to reduced case validity. Photography serves as a crucial step in forensic documentation, preserving a visual record of the evidence in its original condition. If prints are lifted without prior photographic documentation, there is a risk that the prints may be damaged or altered during the lifting process. Consequently, this could weaken the integrity of the evidence presented in court, making it less likely to stand up to scrutiny.

While it's important to note the other consequences—such as the possibility of increased false fingerprints due to improper handling and difficulty in identification if no reference is available—they are secondary to the immediate concern of preserving the integrity of the evidence. The original prints can offer valuable details regarding the scene and the actions taken during the investigation, so the lack of a photographic record could severely undermine the overall case. Thus, ensuring that prints are photographed before any lifting occurs is a critical best practice in evidence collection.