What conclusion did the case Tennessee v. Garner arrive at regarding the use of deadly force?

The conclusion reached in the case of Tennessee v. Garner focuses on the specific circumstances under which law enforcement officers may use deadly force. The ruling established that the use of deadly force is permissible only when there is a clear necessity to prevent the escape of a suspect and when a significant threat to the officer or others is present. This means that officers must assess the situation carefully and determine whether the threat level justifies such a drastic measure.

This decision is significant because it emphasizes the need for a balance between the safety of law enforcement personnel and the rights of individuals. The idea is to protect the lives of both officers and civilians by limiting the application of deadly force to only those instances where there is an immediate and substantial danger involved.

While options hint at the use of force in various situations, they either advocate for broader applications of force or do not outline the necessary threat criteria established by the ruling. Therefore, the correct conclusion aligns with the established legal framework that prioritizes the necessity and immediacy of threats when considering the use of deadly force.